The Blog Of Dennis Worley

Monday, July 17, 2006

Idol or Icon


This excerpt from Chuck Fromm, Editor of Worship Leader Magazine is a very interesting read........

Musical excellence ultimately centers on the topic of performance. First of all, "performance" is often a shunned discussion by Christians as it relates to worship and the church. Why? Because the word "performance" is often translated into something that is inauthentic or lacking integrity. We think of performance as something that is made up or acted out in public, but does not necessarily relate to our private lives. But this way of thinking when applied to a performance art like music is problematic. To make music or deliver a speech, for that matter, requires some kind of grade-able performance.

The amount of professional jobs available for musicians underscores the common phrase of "starving musician." The American Federation of Musicians (AFM), the largest musician union group in America, claim that only 15% of their 45,000 members have steady employment. Of the 35,000 records (CD's) produced professionally in the United States, less than 200 will sell more than 50,000 units. In other words, there are very few rich musicians.

We are a country of people that create our social identities around musical style; we will pay $400 for a U2 ticket and 36.4 million people watched Taylor Hicks become the 5th American Idol. Only the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards garner bigger viewing audiences. America loves excellence in music and performance.

Now admittedly what is "excellent" is very subjective; the criteria is based on the personal taste of the participant or observer. Those who watch American Idol have your own favorite judge. The discourse they create among each other helps give us a language to express what we feel about the performance, as well. Our need is to generate some kind of rational truth about the phenomena that we just experienced, and in order to do that, we need language. In other words, the work of the judges is just as much a performance as that of the talent.

Fortunately, this is not a public process that those responsible for music in worship have to endure. Why? Because our use of music, or any media art for that matter, in worship goes far beyond "mere performance." There is a major difference between an idol and an icon. And idol brings attention to itself. The icon points to God. The goal of our music is to relate people to God. It it does that, it is excellent, if not, it's not.....

2 Comments:

Blogger Mark Kelly Hall said...

"Sing...sing a song
Don't worry that it's not good enough for anyone else to hear
Just sing...sing a song"

I was listening to this song (by choice...and I'm not ashamed to admit it!) as I read your blog!

I think both the article and the song make a similar point; that music is essentially an expression of the heart, and the outward characteristics are secondary to this criterion. In other words, whether it sounds "professional" (dynamic, with perfect pitch and enunciation, in a current or even "hip" style) is not as important as the truthfulness and sincerity of the message and messenger. Substance over style.

I like how Francis Schaeffer put it; there's good or bad art, and art with a good or bad message. The ideal (especially for worship music) is good art with a good message, but sometimes even less-than-stellar quality music can reach people, both because the truth has a power of its own to those who are listening for it, and because people tend not to be as musically educated (and therefore as critical) as the typical music leader.

Of course there are limits to how much a congregation can be blessed and to what extent they can be led into worship by a bad presentation, regardless of the sincerity of the presenter and the truthfulness of the message. We don't do song critiques in church, a la Simon; we do them among ourselves afterward! HA! Imagine if we did church like American Idol..."Let me see...you wandered all over the pitch, the song was completely wrong for your voice, and I couldn't understand anything you said...the good news is I've never been more convinced of the reality of hell!"

I'd say being a music leader in a large Baptist church full of musicians is about as challenging as it gets! And you do a great job--when it comes to the music at BBC, we're all Paula Abdul!

Mark

10:39 AM

 
Blogger Juan said...

Okay, how can I resist.

My issue with the word "performance" is not what Fromm generalizes. He says that "Christians" feel the word translates into something "inauthentic or lacking integrity." For me, the problem I have with it is more like the last paragraph. Is the performer an idol or an icon? (Unless of course, that's the "integrity" issue he touched on with one word.)

There are certain types of "Christian" music I don't like to watch because the message of the song gets lost in the whole, disgusting, "look at me" vibe of it. If the message of the song is being drowned out by the personality holding the microphone, it tends to raise my hackles a bit. My feeling has nothing to do with lights, sound, drums, style, et cetera.

Of course, the most vertical music experience you can have has what Fromm refers to as "grade-able performance." That's my problem with the article - Fromm is confusing the issue of production value with whether something seems vertical and giving, or "look at me" and taking.

Food for thought, nonetheless - - thanks for sharing this with me, it's the most exercise my brain has had all day. It can be dull on the prairie. Perhaps I need to learn how to exhale loudly through my nostrils while I tell liberally-slanted stories about Midwesterners from Norway who live here on the prairie with me. Oh wait, that's been done by Garrison Keillor. Tune in on weekend afternoons.

Miss you man.

6:32 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home